Pechersky District Court of Kyiv found a MP guilty of violating the requirements for preventing and resolving conflicts of interest, the court ordered the official to pay a fine, reports the National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NACP).
“On March 13, 2024, Pechersky District Court of the city of Kyiv, on the basis of materials from the National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NACP), found the MP of Ukraine guilty of violating the statutory requirements for the prevention and resolution of conflicts of interest. In addition, the court ordered him to pay a fine,” the NACP said on the Telegram channel.
The message does not indicate the name of the MP, it is about Oleksandr Dubinsky.
“After the decision enters into legal force, information regarding the MP will be entered into the Unified State Register of Persons who have committed corruption or corruption-related offenses,” the NACP said.
It is noted that the court decision can be appealed within ten days from the date of its issuance and comes into force upon the expiration of the period for filing an appeal.
As reported, on November 8, based on materials from the State Bureau of Investigations, employees of the National Agency on Corruption Prevention handed the current MP of Ukraine Oleksandr Dubinsky a protocol on an administrative offense related to corruption (Part 2 of Article 172-7 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses (Violation of requirements for prevention and resolution of conflicts of interest).
Previously, the SBI carried out a pretrial investigation into the fact that an official had committed official forgery in order to create grounds for traveling abroad.
In addition, the MP sent parliamentary appeals to the Ministry of Health and the State Bureau of Investigations to satisfy private interests, in particular, to obtain information necessary for his own protection from criminal prosecution.
“In August, he sent a parliamentary appeal to the Ministry of Health, in which he demanded to provide information about the progress and results of the consideration of his previous appeal to the Ministry, the official forgery of which is actually the subject of the mentioned pre-trial investigation,” the NACP said.